Xclipse 920 GPU vs Radeon 660M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking593not rated
Place by popularity67not in top-100
Power efficiency14.54no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Van Gogh Lite
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (3 years ago)25 February 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed1500 MHz303 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate45.6031.34
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1624
TMUs2424
Ray Tracing Cores66
L0 Cache96 KB96 KB
L1 Cache128 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6ES 3.2
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 25 February 2022
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 10 months.

Xclipse 920 GPU, on the other hand, has a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 63% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and Xclipse 920 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 520 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xclipse 920 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 660M or Xclipse 920 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.