Arc A350 vs Radeon 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking761not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.05no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 23DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (7 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed1082 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate38.9896.00
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1624
TMUs3248
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s124.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

Arc A350 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 630 and Arc A350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook graphics card while Arc A350 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 36 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Arc A350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 630 or Arc A350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.