Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU vs Radeon 625

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 625 and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 625
2019
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
2.53

Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU outperforms 625 by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking889645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.92no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Xe3 (2026)
GPU code namePolaris 24Wildcat Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (7 years ago)1 May 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed730 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1024 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.58no data
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)no data
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−144%
22
+144%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Fortnite 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−115%
27−30
+115%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
Valorant 40−45
−56.8%
65−70
+56.8%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−110%
100−110
+110%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Dota 2 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Fortnite 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−115%
27−30
+115%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−183%
17
+183%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Valorant 40−45
−56.8%
65−70
+56.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Dota 2 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−115%
27−30
+115%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Valorant 40−45
−127%
100−105
+127%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−153%
45−50
+153%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Valorant 21−24
−174%
60−65
+174%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Dota 2 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how Radeon 625 and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is 144% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Resident Evil 4 Remake, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU performs better in 47 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.53 6.16
Recency 13 May 2019 1 May 2026

Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU has a 143% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 years.

The Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 167 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 625 or Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.