Jetson TX1 vs Radeon 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking920not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.48no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 24GM20B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (7 years ago)4 January 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed730 MHz998 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate24.5815.97
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS0.511 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2416
L1 Cache96 KB96 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2019 4 January 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 6 Watt

Radeon 620 has an age advantage of 4 years.

Jetson TX1, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 733% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 620 and Jetson TX1. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 70 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 5 votes

Rate Jetson TX1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 620 or Jetson TX1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.