Tesla X2070 vs Radeon 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking890not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.84no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameWestonGF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (9 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed730 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate24.5841.66
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2464
L1 Cache96 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 225 Watt

Radeon 530 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

Tesla X2070, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 530 and Tesla X2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 530 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla X2070 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 820 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 530 or Tesla X2070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.