Quadro K200M vs Radeon 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking890not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.87no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameWestonGK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2017 (9 years ago)22 August 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed730 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate24.5813.60
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2416
L1 Cache96 KB16 KB
L2 Cache128 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 22 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

Radeon 530 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro K200M, on the other hand, has 43% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 530 and Quadro K200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 530 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K200M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 828 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 530 or Quadro K200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.