Moore Threads MTT S80 vs Radeon 520 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.76
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)MUSA
GPU code nameBanksChunxiao
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (9 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204096
Core clock speed1030 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors690 million22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60460.8
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs8256
TMUs20256
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.4

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 255 Watt

520 OEM has 410% lower power consumption.

Moore Threads MTT S80, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 OEM and Moore Threads MTT S80. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon 520 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 15 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 520 OEM or Moore Threads MTT S80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.