Radeon RX 5800 vs ATI 3000 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRS780Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2009 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores403072
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1735 MHz
Number of transistors180 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data275 Watt
Texture fill rate1.400333.1
Floating-point processing powerno data10.66 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.0no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm

RX 5800 has a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 3000 IGP and Radeon RX 5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 329 votes

Rate Radeon 3000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 135 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 3000 IGP or Radeon RX 5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.