RTX PRO 6000 vs ATI Radeon 3000 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.15
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameRS780GB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2009 (17 years ago)2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4024064
Core clock speed350 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors180 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rate1.4001,810
Floating-point processing powerno data115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs4752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.03.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 6000 has a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 3000 IGP and RTX PRO 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 3000 IGP is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 329 votes

Rate Radeon 3000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 100 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 3000 IGP or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.