L4 vs ATI Radeon 2100 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.86
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRS740AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 March 2008 (18 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speed400 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2040 MHz
Number of transistors120 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data72 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600489.6
Floating-point processing powerno data30.29 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs4240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data169 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data300.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 March 2008 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

L4 has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 2100 IGP and L4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 2100 IGP is a desktop graphics card while L4 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 51 votes

Rate Radeon 2100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 45 votes

Rate L4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 2100 IGP or L4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.