Rubin Ultra GPU vs RTX PRO 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1131not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.15no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameGB202GR110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2025 (1 year ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2406457344
Core clock speed2017 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2407 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors92,200 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate1,8104,062.5
Floating-point processing power115.8 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs17624
TMUs7521792
Tensor Cores7521792
Ray Tracing Cores188no data
L1 Cache23.5 MB112 MB
L2 Cache128 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Length304 mmno data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount96 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.79 TB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1bNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.4N/A
CUDA10.110.7
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 96 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 3600 Watt

RTX PRO 6000 has 500% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 967% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX PRO 6000 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 100 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 6000 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.