Radeon RX 7600 vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation with Radeon RX 7600, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation
2025, $8,565
96 GB GDDR7, 600 Watt
89.78
+129%

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation outperforms RX 7600 by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4132
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6684.25
Power efficiency11.6518.55
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGB202Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 March 2025 (1 year ago)24 May 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,565 $269

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 7600 has 3067% better value for money than RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240642048
Core clock speed1590 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed2617 MHz2655 MHz
Number of transistors92.2 billion13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate1,968.0339.8
Floating-point processing powerno data21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs19264
TMUs752128
Tensor Cores752no data
Ray Tracing Cores18832
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache23.5 MB512 KB
L2 Cache128 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length304 mm204 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount96 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.79 TB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1b1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.96.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation 89.78
+129%
RX 7600 39.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation 37559
+129%
Samples: 288
RX 7600 16437
Samples: 6907

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD300−350
+113%
141
1440p160−17071
−55.6%
4K80−85
+116%
37

Cost per frame, $

1080p28.551.91
+93.3%
1440p53.533.79
+92.9%
4K107.067.27
+93.2%
  • RX 7600 has 93% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7600 has 93% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7600 has 93% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 348 348
Cyberpunk 2077 148 148
Resident Evil 4 Remake 149 149

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 336 336
Cyberpunk 2077 117 117
Far Cry 5 183 183
Fortnite 170−180 170−180
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 150−160
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
Valorant 230−240 230−240

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 179 179
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 100 100
Far Cry 5 174 174
Far Cry 6 158 158
Fortnite 170−180 170−180
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 150−160
Grand Theft Auto V 150 150
Metro Exodus 113 113
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210 210
Valorant 230−240 230−240

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 90 90
Far Cry 5 163 163
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 150−160
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 123 123
Valorant 230−240 230−240

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180 170−180

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90 90
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290 280−290
Far Cry 6 83 83
Grand Theft Auto V 77 77
Metro Exodus 65 65
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 270−280 270−280

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 56 56
Far Cry 5 115 115
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86 86

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110 100−110

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 22 22
Far Cry 6 25 25
Grand Theft Auto V 82 82
Metro Exodus 38 38
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59 59
Valorant 240−250 240−250

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 60−65
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 24 24
Far Cry 5 57 57
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 50−55

This is how RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation and RX 7600 compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is 113% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is 125% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is 116% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 89.78 39.29
Recency 18 March 2025 24 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 96 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 165 Watt

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation has a 129% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

RX 7600, on the other hand, has 73% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4049 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation or Radeon RX 7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.