Radeon RX 6700 XT vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation
2025, $8,565
96 GB GDDR7, 600 Watt
89.62
+90.6%

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation outperforms 6700 XT by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking480
Place by popularitynot in top-10064
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6142.87
Power efficiency11.6515.95
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGB202Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 March 2025 (1 year ago)3 March 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,565 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6700 XT has 1543% better value for money than RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240642560
Core clock speed1590 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed2617 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors92.2 billion17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate1,968.0413.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs19264
TMUs752160
Tensor Cores752no data
Ray Tracing Cores18840
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cache23.5 MB512 KB
L2 Cache128 MB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length304 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount96 GB12 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.79 TB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1b1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.96.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.41.2
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation 89.62
+90.6%
RX 6700 XT 47.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation 37571
+90.6%
Samples: 293
RX 6700 XT 19710
Samples: 15075

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD270−280
+88.8%
143
1440p140−15077
−45%
4K85−90
+88.9%
45

Cost per frame, $

1080p31.723.35
+89.4%
1440p61.186.22
+89.8%
4K100.7610.64
+89.4%
  • RX 6700 XT has 89% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT has 90% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT has 89% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 349 349
Cyberpunk 2077 119 119
Hogwarts Legacy 170 170
Resident Evil 4 Remake 257 257

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 347 347
Cyberpunk 2077 99 99
Far Cry 5 178 178
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 128 128
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 206 206
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 90 90
Dota 2 175 175
Far Cry 5 169 169
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Grand Theft Auto V 161 161
Hogwarts Legacy 99 99
Metro Exodus 119 119
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223 223
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 85 85
Dota 2 139 139
Far Cry 5 159 159
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 74 74
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127 127
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210 200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126 126
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 102 102
Metro Exodus 71 71
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 56 56
Far Cry 5 137 137
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
Hogwarts Legacy 53 53
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105 100−105

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140 130−140

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 32 32
Grand Theft Auto V 102 102
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35 30−35
Metro Exodus 43 43
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 74
Valorant 280−290 280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 75−80
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 25 25
Dota 2 106 106
Far Cry 5 71 71
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
Hogwarts Legacy 29 29
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 75−80

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 65−70

This is how RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is 89% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is 82% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is 89% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 89.62 47.02
Recency 18 March 2025 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 96 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 230 Watt

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation has a 91% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 29% more advanced lithography process.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has 62% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6700 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8765 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation or Radeon RX 6700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.