GeForce RTX 4090 vs RTX A4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 with GeForce RTX 4090, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4500
2021
20 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
49.44
RTX 4090
2022, $1,599
24 GB GDDR6X, 450 Watt
91.30
+84.7%

RTX 4090 outperforms RTX A4500 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking723
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.91
Power efficiency19.1615.73
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA102AD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 November 2021 (4 years ago)20 September 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores716816384
Core clock speed1050 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate369.61,290.2
Floating-point processing power23.65 TFLOPS82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs96176
TMUs224512
Tensor Cores224512
Ray Tracing Cores56128
L1 Cache7 MB16 MB
L2 Cache6 MB72 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount20 GB24 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth640.0 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.68.9
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A4500 49.44
RTX 4090 91.30
+84.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4500 20595
Samples: 601
RTX 4090 38036
+84.7%
Samples: 22609

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140246
+89.2%
1440p95−100
−48.4%
184
4K70−75
−47.8%
134

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.50
1440pno data8.69
4Kno data11.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 324 324
Counter-Strike 2 351 351
Cyberpunk 2077 227 227
Resident Evil 4 Remake 351 351

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 265 265
Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 340 340
Cyberpunk 2077 224 224
Far Cry 5 209 209
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 234 234
Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 340 340
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 215 215
Dota 2 253 253
Far Cry 5 201 201
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 174 174
Metro Exodus 230 230
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 578 578
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 211 211
Dota 2 224 224
Far Cry 5 187 187
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 305 305
Valorant 680 680

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 312 312
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 162 162
Metro Exodus 180 180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 159 159
Far Cry 5 187 187
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 262 262

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 102 102
Counter-Strike 2 166 166
Grand Theft Auto V 187 187
Metro Exodus 137 137
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 281 281
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 81 81
Dota 2 227 227
Far Cry 5 170 170
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how RTX A4500 and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 89% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 94% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 91% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.44 91.30
Recency 23 November 2021 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 450 Watt

RTX A4500 has 56% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 85% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 20% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A4500 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 218 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18241 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4500 or GeForce RTX 4090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.