Radeon 820M vs RTX A4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4000 with Radeon 820M, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4000
2021
16 GB GDDR6, 140 Watt
46.02
+782%

RTX A4000 outperforms 820M by a whopping 782% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking88688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.6427.15
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGA104Krackan Point 2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (5 years ago)March 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144128
Core clock speed735 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate299.522.40
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs1928
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores482
L0 Cacheno data32 KB
L1 Cache6 MB32 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A4000 46.02
+782%
Radeon 820M 5.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4000 19292
+782%
Samples: 2613
Radeon 820M 2187
Samples: 109

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+750%
10

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 10−12
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11 10−11
Resident Evil 4 Remake 8−9 8−9

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24 21−24
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 10−12
Far Cry 5 16−18 16−18
Fortnite 30−35 30−35
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 24−27
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11 10−11
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 20−22
Valorant 60−65 60−65

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24 21−24
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 24−27
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 10−12
Far Cry 5 16−18 16−18
Fortnite 30−35 30−35
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 24−27
Grand Theft Auto V 16 16
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11 10−11
Metro Exodus 10−11 10−11
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 20−22
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 14−16
Valorant 60−65 60−65

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 21−24
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 10−12
Far Cry 5 16−18 16−18
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 24−27
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11 10−11
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 20−22
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 14−16

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35 30−35

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 10−11
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 40−45
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 5−6
Metro Exodus 4−5 4−5
Valorant 50−55 50−55

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7 6−7
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 4−5
Far Cry 5 10−11 10−11
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 12−14
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 7−8

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11 10−11

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 2−3
Valorant 21−24 21−24

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4 3−4
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 1−2
Far Cry 5 4−5 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 7−8
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 5−6

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 5−6

This is how RTX A4000 and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 is 750% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.02 5.22
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 15 Watt

RTX A4000 has a 782% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 89% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 820M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 726 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4000 or Radeon 820M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.