Radeon 760M vs RTX A4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4000 with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4000
2021
16 GB GDDR6, 140 Watt
46.19
+264%

RTX A4000 outperforms 760M by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking87446
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Power efficiency25.7065.84
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGA104Phoenix
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (5 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144512
Core clock speed735 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate299.583.17
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs19232
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores488
L0 Cacheno data128 KB
L1 Cache6 MB128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A4000 46.19
+264%
Radeon 760M 12.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4000 19324
+264%
Samples: 2552
Radeon 760M 5304
Samples: 2714

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−11029
−71%
1440p65−70
+261%
18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 39 39
Counter-Strike 2 105 105
Cyberpunk 2077 30 30

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 29 29
Battlefield 5 55−60 55−60
Counter-Strike 2 77 77
Cyberpunk 2077 24 24
Far Cry 5 38 38
Fortnite 70−75 70−75
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 45−50
Valorant 100−110 100−110

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 17 17
Battlefield 5 55−60 55−60
Counter-Strike 2 33 33
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 18 18
Dota 2 85−90 85−90
Far Cry 5 35 35
Far Cry 6 35−40 35−40
Fortnite 70−75 70−75
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 55−60
Grand Theft Auto V 36 36
Metro Exodus 27−30 27−30
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38 38
Valorant 100−110 100−110

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 27−30
Dota 2 85−90 85−90
Far Cry 5 33 33
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23 23
Valorant 100−110 100−110

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75 70−75

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16 16
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100 95−100
Far Cry 6 18−20 18−20
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 18−20
Metro Exodus 14−16 14−16
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110 100−110
Valorant 120−130 120−130

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 10−12
Far Cry 5 27−30 27−30
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 30−35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 18−20

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 27−30

4K
High

Atomic Heart 10−11 10−11
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 9−10
Far Cry 6 6−7 6−7
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 24−27
Metro Exodus 9−10 9−10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 16−18
Valorant 60−65 60−65

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 18−20
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 4−5
Dota 2 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 12−14 12−14
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 12−14

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14 12−14

This is how RTX A4000 and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 is 245% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4000 is 261% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.19 12.68
Recency 12 April 2021 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 15 Watt

RTX A4000 has a 264% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 89% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 723 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 535 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4000 or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.