Rubin Ultra GPU vs RTX A3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking213not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.35no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameGA104GR110
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (5 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409657344
Core clock speed600 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1230 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate157.44,062.5
Floating-point processing power10.08 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs1281792
Tensor Cores1281792
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L1 Cache4 MB112 MB
L2 Cache4 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.610.7
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 3600 Watt

RTX A3000 Mobile has 5043% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 16967% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 167% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A3000 Mobile and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 204 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A3000 Mobile or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.