Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile vs RTX A2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking193not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.39no data
Power efficiency35.61no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameGA106Panther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 August 2021 (5 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3328512
Core clock speed562 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate124.873.60
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS2.355 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs10432
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores264
L1 Cache3.3 MB512 KB
L2 Cache3 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 August 2021 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 8 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 25 Watt

Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has an age advantage of 4 years, a 167% more advanced lithography process, and 180% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A2000 and Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A2000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 634 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A2000 or Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.