Radeon PRO W7400 vs RTX A1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking255not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency39.91no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 April 2024 (2 years ago)3 August 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Core clock speed727 MHz330 MHz
Boost clock speed1462 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million13.3 billion
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate105.3123.2
Floating-point processing power6.737 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3264
TMUs72112
Tensor Cores72no data
Ray Tracing Cores1828
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache2.3 MB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length163 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s172.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 April 2024 3 August 2025
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 55 Watt

RTX A1000 has 9% lower power consumption.

PRO W7400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A1000 and Radeon PRO W7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 82 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon PRO W7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A1000 or Radeon PRO W7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.