Tesla K20c vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with Tesla K20c, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms K20c by a whopping 574% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 50 | 565 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.16 |
| Power efficiency | 36.00 | 2.85 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | AD103 | GK110 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 March 2023 (3 years ago) | 12 November 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 9728 | 2496 |
| Core clock speed | 1425 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 45,900 million | 7,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 643.0 | 146.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 41.15 TFLOPS | 3.524 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 112 | 40 |
| TMUs | 304 | 208 |
| Tensor Cores | 304 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB | 208 KB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 1280 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 208.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | 3.5 |
| DLSS | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 55.84 | 8.28 |
| Recency | 21 March 2023 | 12 November 2012 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 5 GB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 574% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 88% lower power consumption.
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K20c in performance tests.
Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla K20c is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
