Radeon 8060S vs RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile with Radeon 8060S, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
46.93
+8.7%

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 8060S by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency36.5361.10
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAD104Strix Halo
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (3 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1110 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate247.2464.0
Floating-point processing power15.82 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6464
TMUs160160
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores4040
L1 Cache5 MBno data
L2 Cache48 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 46.93
+8.7%
Radeon 8060S 43.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19635
+8.7%
Samples: 937
Radeon 8060S 18068
Samples: 1424

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630
Radeon 8060S 43952
+5.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248
Radeon 8060S 29499
+0.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+4.8%
105
1440p55−60
+3.8%
53
4K30−3532
+6.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 230−240 230−240
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 100−110
Resident Evil 4 Remake 120−130 120−130

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 215 215
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 100−110
Far Cry 5 114 114
Fortnite 180−190 180−190
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 160−170
Valorant 250−260 250−260

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 109 109
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 100−110
Far Cry 5 108 108
Far Cry 6 110 110
Fortnite 180−190 180−190
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 160−170
Grand Theft Auto V 132 132
Metro Exodus 100−110 100−110
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 160−170
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 194 194
Valorant 250−260 250−260

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 100−110
Far Cry 5 100 100
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 160−170
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109 109

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190 180−190

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 71 71
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 300−350
Far Cry 6 84 84
Grand Theft Auto V 76 76
Metro Exodus 65−70 65−70
Valorant 290−300 290−300

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 50−55
Far Cry 5 88 88
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 120−130
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85 85

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 110−120

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36 36
Far Cry 6 46 46
Grand Theft Auto V 79 79
Metro Exodus 40−45 40−45
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59 59
Valorant 260−270 260−270

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75 70−75
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 24−27
Far Cry 5 50 50
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 85−90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65 60−65

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60−65 60−65

This is how RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon 8060S compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 5% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 4% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 7% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.93 43.19
Recency 21 March 2023 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 55 Watt

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 9% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 8060S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 45% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon 8060S.

Be aware that RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 8060S is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 65 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 201 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile or Radeon 8060S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.