Arc B390 vs RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile with Arc B390, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
46.94
+119%

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms B390 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency36.5620.89
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameAD104Panther Lake-H
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (3 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201536
Core clock speed1110 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate247.2120.0
Floating-point processing power15.82 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6424
TMUs16048
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores4012
L1 Cache5 MB768 KB
L2 Cache48 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 46.94
+119%
Arc B390 21.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19637
+119%
Samples: 933
Arc B390 8978
Samples: 562

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630
+125%
Arc B390 18489

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248
+71.9%
Arc B390 17018

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−13057
−52.5%
1440p75−80
+108%
36
4K50−55
+108%
24

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Battlefield 5 85−90 85−90
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 87 87
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 85−90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 85−90
Valorant 150−160 150−160

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Battlefield 5 85−90 85−90
Counter-Strike 2 27 27
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 240−250
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 79 79
Far Cry 6 60−65 60−65
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 85−90
Grand Theft Auto V 72 72
Metro Exodus 45−50 45−50
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103 103
Valorant 149 149

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 73 73
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 85−90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 46

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 110−120

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 41 41
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160 150−160
Far Cry 6 35−40 35−40
Grand Theft Auto V 31 31
Metro Exodus 27−30 27−30
Valorant 96 96

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 21−24
Far Cry 5 53 53
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 30−35

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 50−55

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18 18
Far Cry 6 12−14 12−14
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 40−45
Metro Exodus 18−20 18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 30−35
Valorant 45 45

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 9−10
Far Cry 5 24−27 24−27
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 21−24

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 21−24

This is how RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile and Arc B390 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 111% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 108% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 108% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.94 21.46
Recency 21 March 2023 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 119% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc B390, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc B390 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc B390 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 65 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 27 votes

Rate Arc B390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile or Arc B390, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.