Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.84no data
Power efficiency44.92no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameAD107Phoenix
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 February 2024 (2 years ago)13 June 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816768
Core clock speed1620 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2130 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate187.4129.6
Floating-point processing power12 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs8848
Tensor Cores88no data
Ray Tracing Cores2212
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache2.8 MB256 KB
L2 Cache12 MB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length168 mm280 mm
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2024 13 June 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has an age advantage of 7 months.

Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 133% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation and Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 100 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 69 votes

Rate Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Ada Generation or Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.