RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.91no data
Power efficiency44.96no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAD107GB203
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 February 2024 (2 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28167680
Core clock speed1620 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed2130 MHz1702 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate187.4408.5
Floating-point processing power12 TFLOPS26.14 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs88240
Tensor Cores88240
Ray Tracing Cores2260
L1 Cache2.8 MB7.5 MB
L2 Cache12 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.912.0
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 14% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 100 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Ada Generation or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.