Arc G3 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.88no data
Power efficiency44.97no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameAD107Panther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2024 (2 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161280
Core clock speed1620 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2130 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate187.496.00
Floating-point processing power12 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs4820
TMUs8840
Tensor Cores88no data
Ray Tracing Cores2210
L1 Cache2.8 MB640 KB
L2 Cache12 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2024 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 25 Watt

Arc G3 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 67% more advanced lithography process, and 180% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation and Arc G3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while Arc G3 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 100 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc G3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Ada Generation or Arc G3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.