Radeon 760M vs RSX Reality Synthesizer

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated446
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Power efficiencyno data65.84
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameRSX-CXD5302Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 October 2012 (14 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed550 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2599 MHz
Number of transistors302 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.2083.17
Floating-point processing powerno data5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L0 Cacheno data128 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2012 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 90% more advanced lithography process, and 81% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RSX Reality Synthesizer and Radeon 760M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 33 votes

Rate RSX Reality Synthesizer on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 535 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RSX Reality Synthesizer or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.