Radeon RX 6450M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Radeon RX 6450M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023
40 Watt
10.08

6450M outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking494375
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.4924.51
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2023 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speedno data2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2460 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data118.1
Floating-point processing powerno data3.779 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD33
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Palworld 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
−53.3%
65−70
+53.3%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Far Cry 5 31
−71%
50−55
+71%
Fortnite 60−65
−45.9%
85−90
+45.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−52.3%
65−70
+52.3%
Palworld 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Valorant 95−100
−34.7%
120−130
+34.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
−53.3%
65−70
+53.3%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−36.8%
200−210
+36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Far Cry 5 30
−76.7%
50−55
+76.7%
Fortnite 60−65
−45.9%
85−90
+45.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−52.3%
65−70
+52.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−70%
30−35
+70%
Palworld 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−4.9%
40−45
+4.9%
Valorant 95−100
−34.7%
120−130
+34.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
−53.3%
65−70
+53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Far Cry 5 27
−96.3%
50−55
+96.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−52.3%
65−70
+52.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−95.5%
40−45
+95.5%
Valorant 95−100
−34.7%
120−130
+34.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
−45.9%
85−90
+45.9%
Palworld 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−68.4%
30−35
+68.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−53.2%
110−120
+53.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−181%
140−150
+181%
Valorant 100−110
−45.1%
140−150
+45.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−71.4%
35−40
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−63.6%
35−40
+63.6%
Palworld 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Palworld 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−83.3%
21−24
+83.3%
Valorant 45−50
−73.9%
80−85
+73.9%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−64.7%
27−30
+64.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Palworld 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and RX 6450M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6450M is 52% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6450M is 181% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6450M performs better in 62 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.08 15.84
Recency 26 October 2023 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 9 months, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

RX 6450M, on the other hand, has a 57% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon RX 6450M is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 18 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS or Radeon RX 6450M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.