Radeon R7 Graphics vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking642not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.67no data
Architectureno dataGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameno dataSpectre
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2024 (1 year ago)11 January 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768512
Core clock speedno data720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data836 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data23.04
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7373 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2024 11 January 2014
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 25 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 10 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and Radeon R7 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 Graphics is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1847 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or Radeon R7 Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.