Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Qualcomm Adreno 830

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 October 2024 (1 year ago)31 July 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153648
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology3 nmno data
L2 Cache12 MB576 KB

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xno data
Shared memory++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2024 31 July 2025

Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has an age advantage of 9 months.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 830 and Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake). We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 112 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 830 or Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.