Radeon Pro W6600M vs Quadro T500 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro W5300M Pro W5500M Pro W6300M Pro W6600M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T500 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6600M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

T500 Mobile
2020
2 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
8.29

Pro W6600M outperforms T500 Mobile by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile
Pro W6600M Pro W6600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking563225
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.6524.77
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date2 December 2020 (5 years ago)8 June 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961792
Core clock speed1365 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate94.92227.8
Floating-point processing power3.037 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs56112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache896 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−233%
120−130
+233%
1440p15
−233%
50−55
+233%
4K17
−224%
55−60
+224%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
Far Cry 5 30
−217%
95−100
+217%
Fortnite 50−55
−167%
130−140
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−208%
110−120
+208%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−290%
110−120
+290%
Valorant 80−85
−123%
180−190
+123%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−110%
270−280
+110%
Dota 2 90
−47.8%
130−140
+47.8%
Far Cry 5 28
−239%
95−100
+239%
Fortnite 50−55
−167%
130−140
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−208%
110−120
+208%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
−232%
100−110
+232%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−319%
65−70
+319%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−290%
110−120
+290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−232%
90−95
+232%
Valorant 80−85
−123%
180−190
+123%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
Dota 2 75
−77.3%
130−140
+77.3%
Far Cry 5 27
−252%
95−100
+252%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−208%
110−120
+208%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−290%
110−120
+290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−389%
90−95
+389%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
−167%
130−140
+167%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−220%
200−210
+220%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−338%
55−60
+338%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Valorant 85−90
−156%
210−220
+156%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
−316%
75−80
+316%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−290%
75−80
+290%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−329%
70−75
+329%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14
−314%
55−60
+314%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−550%
24−27
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−450%
40−45
+450%
Valorant 35−40
−362%
170−180
+362%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
−411%
45−50
+411%
Dota 2 28
−225%
90−95
+225%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−271%
50−55
+271%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Palworld 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Palworld 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Palworld 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Palworld 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how T500 Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 233% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6600M is 233% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6600M is 224% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M performs better in 42 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.29 28.80
Recency 2 December 2020 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 90 Watt

T500 Mobile has 400% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 247% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
Pro W6600M Radeon Pro W6600M
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
Millennium G400 MAX
vs
RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090
GT 710 PCIe x1 GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
Apple M1 GPU M1 GPU
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RTX 4050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
vs
Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU M2 Max 30-Core GPU
Pro V520 Radeon Pro V520
vs
RX 7650 GRE Radeon RX 7650 GRE
RTX 3080 Max-Q RTX 3080 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4070 Max-Q RTX 4070 Max-Q
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Pro 450 Radeon Pro 450
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
R5 Graphics Radeon R5 Graphics
RX 6400 RX 6400
vs
RX 6700M RX 6700M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 116 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T500 Mobile or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.