Iris Plus Graphics vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro T2000 Max-Q with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.
T2000 Max-Q outperforms Plus Graphics by a whopping 292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 370 | 736 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 32.43 | 22.04 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) |
| GPU code name | TU117 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 (7 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.318 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 8 |
| TMUs | 64 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 57
+307%
| 14−16 |
| 1440p | 26 | 6−7
−76.9%
|
| 4K | 38 | 9−10
−76.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+296%
|
24−27 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+300%
|
9−10 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+300%
|
8−9 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 35−40
+311%
|
9−10 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+300%
|
18−20 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+296%
|
24−27 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+300%
|
9−10 |
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+300%
|
14−16 |
| Fortnite | 90−95
+338%
|
21−24 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+338%
|
16−18 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+300%
|
8−9 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+300%
|
16−18 |
| Valorant | 130−140
+337%
|
30−33 |
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+300%
|
18−20 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+296%
|
24−27 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+330%
|
50−55 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+300%
|
9−10 |
| Dota 2 | 124
+313%
|
30−33 |
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+300%
|
14−16 |
| Fortnite | 90−95
+338%
|
21−24 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+338%
|
16−18 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 60−65
+294%
|
16−18 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+300%
|
8−9 |
| Metro Exodus | 33
+313%
|
8−9 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+300%
|
16−18 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 63
+294%
|
16−18 |
| Valorant | 130−140
+337%
|
30−33 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+300%
|
18−20 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+300%
|
9−10 |
| Dota 2 | 113
+319%
|
27−30 |
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+300%
|
14−16 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+338%
|
16−18 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+300%
|
8−9 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+300%
|
16−18 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 33
+313%
|
8−9 |
| Valorant | 130−140
+337%
|
30−33 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 90−95
+338%
|
21−24 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+325%
|
8−9 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+313%
|
30−33 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+300%
|
7−8 |
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+340%
|
5−6 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+343%
|
35−40 |
| Valorant | 150−160
+331%
|
35−40 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+300%
|
12−14 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4 |
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+322%
|
9−10 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+320%
|
10−11 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+317%
|
6−7 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
+333%
|
9−10 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3 |
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+300%
|
6−7 |
| Valorant | 85−90
+310%
|
21−24 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+317%
|
6−7 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2 |
| Dota 2 | 46
+360%
|
10−11 |
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+329%
|
7−8 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5 |
This is how T2000 Max-Q and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:
- T2000 Max-Q is 307% faster in 1080p
- T2000 Max-Q is 333% faster in 1440p
- T2000 Max-Q is 322% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.64 | 4.24 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
T2000 Max-Q has a 292% higher aggregate performance score.
Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has a 17% more advanced lithography process, and 63% lower power consumption.
The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
