Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Quadro T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 T1000 T1000 8 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 with Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), including specs and performance data.

Quadro T1000
2019
50 Watt
15.65
+66.3%

T1000 outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking384514
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.21no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameTU117Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed1395 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
L1 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory clock speed8000 MHzno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+50%
20
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how Quadro T1000 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 50% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.65 9.41
Recency 27 May 2019 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

Quadro T1000 has a 66% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
vs
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
vs
R9 M390X Radeon R9 M390X
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
vs
Quadro Quadro
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
L20 L20
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
Arc 130T Mobile Arc 130T Mobile
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
RX 5770 RX 5770
vs
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 Adreno X2 85
RTX 3000 Max-Q RTX 3000 Max-Q
vs
Arc B580 Arc B580
RX 5700 RX 5700
vs
Graphics 384SP Graphics 384SP
MX150 GP107 MX150 GP107
vs
GB10 GB10
RTX 2080 Super RTX 2080 Super
vs
CMP 100HX-210 CMP 100HX-210
GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
FirePro W5000 W5000
GeForce MX330 MX330
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 560 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1000 or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.