Tegra X1 GPU vs Quadro RTX 6000
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 102 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.04 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.64 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | TU102 | GM20B |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 August 2018 (8 years ago) | 4 January 2015 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4608 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 18,600 million | 2,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 20 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 260 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 509.8 | 16.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 16.31 TFLOPS | 0.512 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 16 |
| TMUs | 288 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 576 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 5.3 |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 August 2018 | 4 January 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 20 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 260 Watt | 15 Watt |
RTX 6000 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.
Tegra X1 GPU, on the other hand, has 1633% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 6000 and Tegra X1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Tegra X1 GPU is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
