Atari VCS 400 GPU vs Quadro RTX 6000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking103not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.03no data
Power efficiency12.64no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU102Banded Kestrel
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)14 December 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608192
Core clock speed1440 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1201 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate509.814.41
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS0.4612 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs28812
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L1 Cache4.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mm295 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 14 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 6000 has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

Atari VCS 400 GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 1633% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 6000 and Atari VCS 400 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Atari VCS 400 GPU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 148 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atari VCS 400 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 6000 or Atari VCS 400 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.