Arc Graphics 140V vs Quadro RTX 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 112EU Mobile Graphics 128EU Mobile Graphics 130T Graphics 130V Graphics 140T Graphics 140V

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 6000 with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

RTX 6000
2018, $6,299
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
42.47
+244%

RTX 6000 outperforms Graphics 140V by a whopping 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking102450
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.03no data
Power efficiency12.64no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameTU102Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (8 years ago)24 September 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46088
Core clock speed1440 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Wattno data
Texture fill rate509.8no data
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L1 Cache4.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 6000 42.47
+244%
Arc Graphics 140V 12.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 17693
+244%
Samples: 284
Arc Graphics 140V 5137
Samples: 4358

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+233%
39
−233%
1440p80−85
+233%
24
−233%
4K65−70
+242%
19
−242%

Cost per frame, $

1080p48.45no data
1440p78.74no data
4K96.91no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 65
+0%
65
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 47
+0%
47
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Palworld 49
+0%
49
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 28
+0%
28
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Palworld 27
+0%
27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 114
+0%
114
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Palworld 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how RTX 6000 and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 233% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 is 233% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 is 242% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 42.47 12.33
Recency 13 August 2018 24 September 2024
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm

RTX 6000 has a 244% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Pro W6900X Radeon Pro W6900X
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
R9 M295X Radeon R9 M295X
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
H100 SXM5 H100 SXM5
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
A100X A100X
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
H800 PCIe 80 GB PCIe 80 GB
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
H200 SXM 141 GB SXM 141 GB
R9 A375 Radeon R9 A375
vs
R5 M250 R5 M250
R9 A375 Radeon R9 A375
vs
R7 M270DX R7 M270DX
R9 A375 Radeon R9 A375
vs
HD Graphics P4700 Graphics P4700
R9 A375 Radeon R9 A375
vs
Pro 575X Pro 575X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 148 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 104 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 6000 or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.