Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Quadro RTX 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.44no data
Power efficiency12.38no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)MUSA
GPU code nameTU104Chunxiao
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30728192
Core clock speed1620 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate348.5768.0
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPS24.58 TFLOPS
ROPs64512
TMUs192512
Tensor Cores384128
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm266 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s768.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.5-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 450 Watt

RTX 5000 has 96% lower power consumption.

Moore Threads MTT S4000, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and Moore Threads MTT S4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 249 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 47 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 or Moore Threads MTT S4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.