UHD Graphics P630 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with UHD Graphics P630, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
32.59
+451%

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms Graphics P630 by a whopping 451% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking188653
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.9230.53
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Coffee Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (7 years ago)24 May 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072192
Core clock speed1035 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate296.628.80
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs643
TMUs19224
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+529%
21−24
−529%
1440p84
+500%
14−16
−500%
4K54
+500%
9−10
−500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+534%
27−30
−534%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+525%
12−14
−525%
Palworld 85−90
+514%
14−16
−514%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 85−90
+750%
10−11
−750%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 165
+560%
24−27
−560%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+534%
27−30
−534%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+525%
12−14
−525%
Far Cry 5 128
+574%
18−20
−574%
Fortnite 140−150
+311%
35−40
−311%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+374%
27−30
−374%
Palworld 85−90
+514%
14−16
−514%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+500%
21−24
−500%
Valorant 200−210
+199%
65−70
−199%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 162
+548%
24−27
−548%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+534%
27−30
−534%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+180%
95−100
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+525%
12−14
−525%
Dota 2 98
+100%
45−50
−100%
Far Cry 5 123
+547%
18−20
−547%
Fortnite 140−150
+311%
35−40
−311%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+374%
27−30
−374%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+443%
21−24
−443%
Metro Exodus 99
+800%
10−12
−800%
Palworld 85−90
+514%
14−16
−514%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+500%
21−24
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+1031%
16−18
−1031%
Valorant 200−210
+199%
65−70
−199%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 152
+508%
24−27
−508%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+525%
12−14
−525%
Dota 2 92
+87.8%
45−50
−87.8%
Far Cry 5 115
+505%
18−20
−505%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+374%
27−30
−374%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+500%
21−24
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+525%
16−18
−525%
Valorant 181
+166%
65−70
−166%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+311%
35−40
−311%
Palworld 85−90
+514%
14−16
−514%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+618%
10−12
−618%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+402%
45−50
−402%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+1000%
6−7
−1000%
Metro Exodus 59
+1080%
5−6
−1080%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+361%
35−40
−361%
Valorant 230−240
+284%
60−65
−284%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 124
+1278%
9−10
−1278%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Far Cry 5 102
+827%
10−12
−827%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+543%
14−16
−543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+638%
8−9
−638%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+608%
12−14
−608%
Palworld 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+300%
16−18
−300%
Metro Exodus 37 0−1
Palworld 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+1675%
4−5
−1675%
Valorant 190−200
+692%
24−27
−692%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 73
+1725%
4−5
−1725%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Dota 2 95−100
+371%
21−24
−371%
Far Cry 5 56
+1020%
5−6
−1020%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+567%
9−10
−567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Palworld 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 529% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 1725% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5000 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics P630 in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.59 5.92
Recency 27 May 2019 24 May 2018
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 451% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics P630, on the other hand, has 633% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics P630 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 64 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 56 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or UHD Graphics P630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.