Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
32.49
RX 9060 XT 8 GB
2025, $299
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
47.05
+44.8%

9060 XT 8 GB outperforms RTX 5000 Mobile by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19080
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data95.57
Power efficiency22.9824.40
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 44
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (7 years ago)4 June 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722048
Core clock speed1035 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate296.6400.6
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs192128
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores4832
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132190−200
+43.9%
1440p84
−30%
120−130
4K5475−80
+38.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.57
1440pno data2.49
4Kno data3.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190 260−270
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 100−105
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 100−105
+35.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 85−90 120−130
+41.2%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 165 230−240
+39.4%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 260−270
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 100−105
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 128 180−190
+40.6%
Fortnite 140−150 210−220
+41.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 180−190
+40.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 100−105
+35.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 190−200
+42.9%
Valorant 200−210 290−300
+40.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 162 230−240
+42%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 260−270
+41.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 400−450
+44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 100−105
+33.3%
Dota 2 98 140−150
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 123 170−180
+38.2%
Fortnite 140−150 210−220
+41.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 180−190
+40.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120 160−170
+40.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 100−105
+35.1%
Metro Exodus 99 140−150
+41.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 190−200
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181 260−270
+43.6%
Valorant 200−210 290−300
+40.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 152 220−230
+44.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 100−105
+33.3%
Dota 2 92 130−140
+41.3%
Far Cry 5 115 160−170
+39.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 180−190
+40.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 100−105
+35.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 190−200
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100 140−150
+40%
Valorant 181 260−270
+43.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 210−220
+41.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 110−120
+39.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 300−310
+29.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 95−100
+43.9%
Metro Exodus 59 85−90
+44.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 250−260
+42.9%
Valorant 230−240 300−310
+26.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 124 170−180
+37.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 50−55
+38.9%
Far Cry 5 102 140−150
+37.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 130−140
+44.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 55−60
+44.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 85−90
+44.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 120−130
+41.2%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 50−55
+35.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 95−100
+39.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 30−33
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 37 50−55
+35.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71 100−105
+40.8%
Valorant 190−200 280−290
+40.7%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 73 100−105
+37%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 50−55
+35.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 21−24
+31.3%
Dota 2 100−105 140−150
+40%
Far Cry 5 56 80−85
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 85−90
+41.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 30−33
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 55−60
+34.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45 55−60
+37.5%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and RX 9060 XT 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 44% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 43% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 39% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.49 47.05
Recency 27 May 2019 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 27% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 45% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 64 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 501 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.