FirePro V7900 SDI vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameTU104BCayman
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date8 June 2020 (6 years ago)24 May 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721280
Core clock speed1035 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt224 Watt
Texture fill rate296.658.00
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs19280
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MB320 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2020 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 224 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 104% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and FirePro V7900 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh or FirePro V7900 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.