Rubin Ultra GPU vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking159not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.23no data
Power efficiency17.22no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameTU104GR110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2018 (7 years ago)2027
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230457344
Core clock speed1005 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate222.54,062.5
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs1441792
Tensor Cores2881792
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MB112 MB
L2 Cache4 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA7.510.7
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 3600 Watt

RTX 4000 has 2150% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 541 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.