Radeon R9 390X vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with Radeon R9 390X, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018, $899
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
35.48
+61.5%

RTX 4000 outperforms R9 390X by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.788.53
Power efficiency17.276.22
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTU104Grenada
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date13 November 2018 (7 years ago)18 June 2015 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4000 has 26% better value for money than R9 390X.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042816
Core clock speed1005 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5184.8
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS5.914 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144176
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MB704 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm275 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data-
Maximum RAM amount8 GB0 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s384 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.86.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.3+
Mantle-+
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 35.48
+61.5%
R9 390X 21.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 14844
+61.5%
Samples: 2818
R9 390X 9190
Samples: 1403

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−15091
−35%
4K75−80
+56.3%
48

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.424.71
+26.6%
4K11.998.94
+25.4%
  • R9 390X has 27% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R9 390X has 25% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55 50−55

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 70−75 70−75
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 85−90
Valorant 150−160 150−160

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 240−250
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Dota 2 110−120 110−120
Far Cry 5 70−75 70−75
Far Cry 6 60−65 60−65
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85 80−85
Metro Exodus 45−50 45−50
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76 76
Valorant 150−160 150−160

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Dota 2 110−120 110−120
Far Cry 5 70−75 70−75
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41 41
Valorant 150−160 150−160

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 110−120

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 45−50
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 6 35−40 35−40
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 40−45
Metro Exodus 30−33 30−33
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 180−190 180−190

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 21−24
Far Cry 5 50−55 50−55
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 35−40

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 50−55

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 21−24
Far Cry 6 12−14 12−14
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 40−45
Metro Exodus 18−20 18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 29
Valorant 120−130 120−130

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 35−40
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 21−24
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 9−10
Dota 2 75−80 75−80
Far Cry 5 24−27 24−27
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 21−24

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 24−27

This is how RTX 4000 and R9 390X compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 is 54% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 is 56% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.48 21.97
Recency 13 November 2018 18 June 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 275 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 61% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 57% more advanced lithography process, and 42% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 390X in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 390X is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 542 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 298 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Radeon R9 390X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.