ATI FireGL V7350 vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking159not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.23no data
Power efficiency17.22no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameTU104R520
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2018 (7 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1005 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt111 Watt
Texture fill rate222.59.600
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6416
TMUs14416
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.83.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2018 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 111 Watt

RTX 4000 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7350, on the other hand, has 44% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 541 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or FireGL V7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.