CMP 30HX vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.82
Power efficiencyno data9.05
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU106TU116
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (7 years ago)25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201408
Core clock speed945 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate165.6157.1
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs12088
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data
L1 Cache1.9 MB1.4 MB
L2 Cache4 MB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.57.5
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 25 February 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 125 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 56% lower power consumption.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and CMP 30HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation graphics card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 55 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh or CMP 30HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.