Arc Pro B65 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking325not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.97no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTU106BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (7 years ago)April 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed600 MHz2400 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate175.0384.0
Floating-point processing power5.599 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs144160
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores3620
L1 Cache2.3 MB5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB10 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s608.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 200 Watt

RTX 3000 Max-Q has 233% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B65, on the other hand, has a 433% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and Arc Pro B65. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro B65 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 55 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 54 votes

Rate Arc Pro B65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q or Arc Pro B65, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.