Radeon Vega 7 vs Quadro Plex 2100 S4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated613
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Power efficiencyno data11.57
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG80Cezanne
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2008 (18 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128 ×4448
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors681 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)640 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40 ×453.20
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS ×41.702 TFLOPS
ROPs24 ×48
TMUs32 ×428
L2 Cache96 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length522 mmno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB ×4System Shared
Memory bus width384 Bit ×4System Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 640 Watt 45 Watt

Vega 7 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1186% more advanced lithography process, and 1322% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 2100 S4 and Radeon Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro Plex 2100 S4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Quadro Plex 2100 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3468 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 2100 S4 or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.