Tegra K1 vs Quadro P620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking536not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.25no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGP107GK20A
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speed1177 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz951 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate46.187.608
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6ES 3.1
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P620 11131
+1459%
Tegra K1 714

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 8 Watt

Quadro P620 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra K1, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P620 and Tegra K1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while Tegra K1 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 798 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 10 votes

Rate Tegra K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P620 or Tegra K1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.