RTX A2000 Mobile vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A4 Mobile A1000 Mobile A1000 Mobile 6 GB A2000 Max-Q A2000 Max-Q 8 GB A2000 Mobile A2000 Mobile 8 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with RTX A2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016, $5,999
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
36.93
+63.2%

P6000 outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.71no data
Power efficiency11.4318.43
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP102GA107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402560
Core clock speed1506 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8135.0
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS8.637 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs24080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache1.4 MB2.5 MB
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P6000 36.93
+63.2%
RTX A2000 Mobile 22.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15386
+63.2%
Samples: 195
RTX A2000 Mobile 9428
Samples: 2064

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+51.9%
79
−51.9%
1440p65−70
+54.8%
42
−54.8%
4K60−65
+57.9%
38
−57.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.99no data
1440p92.29no data
4K99.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+0%
96
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50
+0%
50
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 52% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 55% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 58% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 36.93 22.63
Recency 1 October 2016 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 95 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 63% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 163% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
Quadro P2000 NVIDIA Quadro P2000
vs
ATI 9700 PRO Radeon 9700 PRO
Quadro P2000 NVIDIA Quadro P2000
vs
ATI LE Radeon LE
Quadro P2000 NVIDIA Quadro P2000
vs
A16 PCIe A16 PCIe
M3000 SE NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
vs
FX 4000 SDI FX 4000 SDI
Quadro P6000 NVIDIA Quadro P6000
vs
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro P6000 NVIDIA Quadro P6000
vs
A2 PCIe A2 PCIe
Quadro P6000 NVIDIA Quadro P6000
vs
RX 7800M RX 7800M
Tesla P4 NVIDIA Tesla P4
vs
ATI HD 4350 AGP HD 4350 AGP
Tesla P4 NVIDIA Tesla P4
vs
ATI Rage 128 Ultra Rage 128 Ultra
Tesla P4 NVIDIA Tesla P4
vs
W4150M FirePro W4150M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 120 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 142 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.