GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Quadro P6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016, $5,999
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
36.93
+37%

P6000 outperforms RTX 2060 Mobile by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.71no data
Power efficiency11.4318.13
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)29 January 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401920
Core clock speed1506 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8144.0
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs240120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cache1.4 MB1.9 MB
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+34.6%
104
−34.6%
1440p90−95
+36.4%
66
−36.4%
4K55−60
+31%
42
−31%

Cost per frame, $

1080p42.85no data
1440p66.66no data
4K109.07no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Palworld 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 162
+0%
162
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+0%
108
+0%
Palworld 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 171
+0%
171
+0%
Valorant 223
+0%
223
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Fortnite 144
+0%
144
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+0%
107
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
Palworld 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 147
+0%
147
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
+0%
111
+0%
Valorant 196
+0%
196
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+0%
88
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 112
+0%
112
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 123
+0%
123
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 113
+0%
113
+0%
Palworld 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 212
+0%
212
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 74
+0%
74
+0%
Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 171
+0%
171
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
+0%
38
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 34
+0%
34
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 35% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 36% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 31% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.93 26.95
Recency 1 October 2016 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 37% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 117% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 120 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1984 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.