GeForce 8400M GS vs Quadro P5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8200M G 8200M G mGPU AMD 8200M G mGPU Intel 8400M G 8400M GS 8400M GT 8600M GS 8600M GT 8600M GT Mac Edition 8600M GT SLI 8700M GT 8700M GT SLI 8800M GTS 8800M GTX 8800M GTX SLI 9300M G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 with GeForce 8400M GS, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5200
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
26.75
+99%

P5200 outperforms 8400M GS by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
8400M GS 8400M GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2461423
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.731.97
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP104G86
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (8 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$14.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256016
Core clock speed1556 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rate279.43.200
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1608
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-I
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.11.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5200 26.75
+99%
8400M GS 0.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 11146
+99%
Samples: 223
8400M GS 117
Samples: 640

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
+99.2%
1−2
−99.2%
4K480−1

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data14.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 75−80
+98.7%
1−2
−98.7%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+99.3%
1−2
−99.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 65−70
+100%
0−1
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 75−80
+98.7%
1−2
−98.7%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+99%
1−2
−99%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+99.3%
1−2
−99.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 0−1
Far Cry 5 85−90
+100%
0−1
−100%
Fortnite 120−130
+99.2%
1−2
−99.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+97.2%
3−4
−97.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+93.5%
7−8
−93.5%
Valorant 180−190
+84.4%
27−30
−84.4%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 75−80
+98.7%
1−2
−98.7%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+99%
1−2
−99%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+99.3%
1−2
−99.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+95.1%
12−14
−95.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 0−1
Dota 2 120−130
+93%
9−10
−93%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+100%
0−1
−100%
Fortnite 120−130
+99.2%
1−2
−99.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+97.2%
3−4
−97.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+99%
1−2
−99%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+100%
0−1
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+93.5%
7−8
−93.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+95.8%
5−6
−95.8%
Valorant 180−190
+84.4%
27−30
−84.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+99%
1−2
−99%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 0−1
Dota 2 120−130
+93%
9−10
−93%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+100%
0−1
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+97.2%
3−4
−97.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+93.5%
7−8
−93.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+92.3%
5−6
−92.3%
Valorant 180−190
+84.4%
27−30
−84.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+99.2%
1−2
−99.2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+96.7%
2−3
−96.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+100%
0−1
−100%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+100%
0−1
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+98.3%
3−4
−98.3%
Valorant 200−210
+99%
2−3
−99%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+100%
0−1
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+100%
0−1
−100%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+100%
0−1
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+97.8%
1−2
−97.8%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+100%
0−1
−100%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 21−24
+100%
0−1
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+100%
0−1
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+73.6%
14−16
−73.6%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+100%
0−1
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+100%
0−1
−100%
Valorant 150−160
+96.8%
5−6
−96.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+100%
0−1
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+100%
0−1
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
0−1
−100%
Dota 2 85−90
+100%
0−1
−100%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+100%
0−1
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+100%
0−1
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+96.7%
1−2
−96.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+93.5%
2−3
−93.5%

This is how Quadro P5200 and 8400M GS compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5200 is 99% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Quadro P5200 is 99% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5200 surpassed 8400M GS in all 24 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 26.75 0.28
Recency 21 February 2018 9 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 11 Watt

Quadro P5200 has a 99% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 98% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 80% more advanced lithography process.

8400M GS, on the other hand, has 89% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400M GS is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 48
8400M GS GeForce 8400M GS
vs
9400M (G) / ION (LE) GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
GTX 1070 SLI GTX 1070 SLI
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
GTX 1070 SLI GTX 1070 SLI
vs
Quadro P2200 P2200
GTX 1070 SLI GTX 1070 SLI
vs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Quadro P5200 P5200
vs
RX 470 RX 470
Quadro P5200 P5200
vs
8700M GT SLI 8700M GT SLI
Quadro P5200 P5200
vs
8400M G 8400M G
Quadro P5200 P5200
vs
Plex 7000 Plex 7000
Quadro P5200 P5200
vs
P4000 Max-Q P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 P5200
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
Quadro P5200 P5200
vs
RX 6700 RX 6700

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 109 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 46 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 or GeForce 8400M GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.