Radeon RX 580 Mobile vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P4200 Max-Q with Radeon RX 580 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
P4200 Max-Q outperforms 580 Mobile by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 240 | 348 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.28 |
| Power efficiency | 21.31 | 14.14 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) | 18 April 2017 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $301.69 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1077 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 213.1 | 155.1 |
| Floating-point processing power | 6.82 TFLOPS | 4.963 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 864 KB | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1753 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 110−120 | 77
−30%
|
| 4K | 45−50
+50%
| 30 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 3.92 |
| 4K | no data | 10.06 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 40−45 | 40−45 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Fortnite | 183 | 183 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 69 | 69 |
| Valorant | 130−140 | 130−140 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Dota 2 | 76 | 76 |
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Fortnite | 81 | 81 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 62 | 62 |
| Metro Exodus | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 57 | 57 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 68 | 68 |
| Valorant | 130−140 | 130−140 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Dota 2 | 69 | 69 |
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 41 | 41 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37 | 37 |
| Valorant | 130−140 | 130−140 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 60 | 60 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Metro Exodus | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| Valorant | 160−170 | 160−170 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30 | 27−30 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24 | 24 |
| Valorant | 95−100 | 95−100 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| Dota 2 | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14 | 14 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20 | 18−20 |
This is how P4200 Max-Q and RX 580 Mobile compete in popular games:
- P4200 Max-Q is 43% faster in 1080p
- P4200 Max-Q is 50% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.36 | 18.15 |
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 14 nm |
P4200 Max-Q has a 51% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.
RX 580 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 13% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 580 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
